r1 - 04 Mar 2006 - NelsonFerraz
- NAME
- SYNOPSIS
- DESCRIPTION
- Behavior of other Perl features in forked pseudo-processes
- Resource limits
- Killing the parent process
- Lifetime of the parent process and pseudo-processes
- CAVEATS AND LIMITATIONS
- BUGS
- AUTHOR
- SEE ALSO
NAME
perlfork - Perl'sfork() emulation
SYNOPSIS
NOTE: As of the 5.8.0 release, fork() emulation has considerably
matured. However, there are still a few known bugs and differences
from real fork() that might affect you. See the "BUGS" and
"CAVEATS AND LIMITATIONS" sections below.
Perl provides a fork() keyword that corresponds to the Unix system call
of the same name. On most Unix-like platforms where the fork() system
call is available, Perl's fork() simply calls it.
On some platforms such as Windows where the fork() system call is not
available, Perl can be built to emulate fork() at the interpreter level.
While the emulation is designed to be as compatible as possible with the
real fork() at the level of the Perl program, there are certain
important differences that stem from the fact that all the pseudo child
``processes'' created this way live in the same real process as far as the
operating system is concerned.
This document provides a general overview of the capabilities and
limitations of the fork() emulation. Note that the issues discussed here
are not applicable to platforms where a real fork() is available and Perl
has been configured to use it.
DESCRIPTION
Thefork() emulation is implemented at the level of the Perl interpreter.
What this means in general is that running fork() will actually clone the
running interpreter and all its state, and run the cloned interpreter in
a separate thread, beginning execution in the new thread just after the
point where the fork() was called in the parent. We will refer to the
thread that implements this child ``process'' as the pseudo-process.
To the Perl program that called fork(), all this is designed to be
transparent. The parent returns from the fork() with a pseudo-process
ID that can be subsequently used in any process manipulation functions;
the child returns from the fork() with a value of 0 to signify that
it is the child pseudo-process.
Behavior of other Perl features in forked pseudo-processes
Most Perl features behave in a natural way within pseudo-processes.- $$ or $PROCESS_ID
- This special variable is correctly set to the pseudo-process ID.
- It can be used to identify pseudo-processes within a particular
- session. Note that this value is subject to recycling if any
- pseudo-processes are launched after others have been wait()-ed on.
- %ENV
- Each pseudo-process maintains its own virtual environment. Modifications
- to %ENV affect the virtual environment, and are only visible within that
- pseudo-process, and in any processes (or pseudo-processes) launched from
- it.
chdir()and all other builtins that accept filenames
- Each pseudo-process maintains its own virtual idea of the current directory.
-
Modifications to the current directory using
chdir()are only visible within - that pseudo-process, and in any processes (or pseudo-processes) launched from
- it. All file and directory accesses from the pseudo-process will correctly
- map the virtual working directory to the real working directory appropriately.
wait()andwaitpid()
-
wait()andwaitpid()can be passed a pseudo-process ID returned by fork(). - These calls will properly wait for the termination of the pseudo-process
- and return its status.
kill()
-
kill()can be used to terminate a pseudo-process by passing it the ID returned - by fork(). This should not be used except under dire circumstances, because
- the operating system may not guarantee integrity of the process resources
-
when a running thread is terminated. Note that using
kill()on a - pseudo-process() may typically cause memory leaks, because the thread that
- implements the pseudo-process does not get a chance to clean up its resources.
exec()
-
Calling
exec()within a pseudo-process actually spawns the requested - executable in a separate process and waits for it to complete before
- exiting with the same exit status as that process. This means that the
- process ID reported within the running executable will be different from
-
what the earlier Perl
fork()might have returned. Similarly, any process -
manipulation functions applied to the ID returned by
fork()will affect the - waiting pseudo-process that called exec(), not the real process it is
- waiting for after the exec().
exit()
-
exit()always exits just the executing pseudo-process, after automatically - wait()-ing for any outstanding child pseudo-processes. Note that this means
- that the process as a whole will not exit unless all running pseudo-processes
- have exited.
- Open handles to files, directories and network sockets
- All open handles are dup()-ed in pseudo-processes, so that closing
- any handles in one process does not affect the others. See below for
- some limitations.
Resource limits
In the eyes of the operating system, pseudo-processes created via thefork()
emulation are simply threads in the same process. This means that any
process-level limits imposed by the operating system apply to all
pseudo-processes taken together. This includes any limits imposed by the
operating system on the number of open file, directory and socket handles,
limits on disk space usage, limits on memory size, limits on CPU utilization
etc.
Killing the parent process
If the parent process is killed (either using Perl'skill() builtin, or
using some external means) all the pseudo-processes are killed as well,
and the whole process exits.
Lifetime of the parent process and pseudo-processes
During the normal course of events, the parent process and every pseudo-process started by it will wait for their respective pseudo-children to complete before they exit. This means that the parent and every pseudo-child created by it that is also a pseudo-parent will only exit after their pseudo-children have exited. A way to mark a pseudo-processes as running detached from their parent (so that the parent would not have towait() for them if it doesn't want to)
will be provided in future.
CAVEATS AND LIMITATIONS
- BEGIN blocks
-
The
fork()emulation will not work entirely correctly when called from - within a BEGIN block. The forked copy will run the contents of the
- BEGIN block, but will not continue parsing the source stream after the
- BEGIN block. For example, consider the following code:
-
BEGIN { -
fork and exit; # fork child and exit the parent -
print "inner\n"; -
} -
print "outer\n"; - This will print:
-
inner - rather than the expected:
-
inner -
outer - This limitation arises from fundamental technical difficulties in
- cloning and restarting the stacks used by the Perl parser in the
- middle of a parse.
- Open filehandles
-
Any filehandles open at the time of the
fork()will be dup()-ed. Thus, - the files can be closed independently in the parent and child, but beware
- that the dup()-ed handles will still share the same seek pointer. Changing
- the seek position in the parent will change it in the child and vice-versa.
- One can avoid this by opening files that need distinct seek pointers
- separately in the child.
- Forking pipe
open()not yet implemented
-
The
open(FOO, "|-")andopen(BAR, "-|")constructs are not yet - implemented. This limitation can be easily worked around in new code
- by creating a pipe explicitly. The following example shows how to
- write to a forked child:
-
# simulate open(FOO, "|-") -
sub pipe_to_fork ($) { -
my $parent = shift; -
pipe my $child, $parent or die; -
my $pid = fork(); -
die "fork() failed: $!" unless defined $pid; -
if ($pid) { -
close $child; -
} -
else { -
close $parent; -
open(STDIN, "<&=" . fileno($child)) or die; -
} -
$pid; -
} -
if (pipe_to_fork('FOO')) { -
# parent -
print FOO "pipe_to_fork\n"; -
close FOO; -
} -
else { -
# child -
while (<STDIN>) { print; } -
exit(0); -
} - And this one reads from the child:
-
# simulate open(FOO, "-|") -
sub pipe_from_fork ($) { -
my $parent = shift; -
pipe $parent, my $child or die; -
my $pid = fork(); -
die "fork() failed: $!" unless defined $pid; -
if ($pid) { -
close $child; -
} -
else { -
close $parent; -
open(STDOUT, ">&=" . fileno($child)) or die; -
} -
$pid; -
} -
if (pipe_from_fork('BAR')) { -
# parent -
while (<BAR>) { print; } -
close BAR; -
} -
else { -
# child -
print "pipe_from_fork\n"; -
exit(0); -
} -
Forking pipe
open()constructs will be supported in future. - Global state maintained by XSUBs
- External subroutines (XSUBs) that maintain their own global state may
- not work correctly. Such XSUBs will either need to maintain locks to
- protect simultaneous access to global data from different pseudo-processes,
- or maintain all their state on the Perl symbol table, which is copied
-
naturally when
fork()is called. A callback mechanism that provides - extensions an opportunity to clone their state will be provided in the
- near future.
- Interpreter embedded in larger application
-
The
fork()emulation may not behave as expected when it is executed in an - application which embeds a Perl interpreter and calls Perl APIs that can
- evaluate bits of Perl code. This stems from the fact that the emulation
- only has knowledge about the Perl interpreter's own data structures and
- knows nothing about the containing application's state. For example, any
- state carried on the application's own call stack is out of reach.
- Thread-safety of extensions
-
Since the
fork()emulation runs code in multiple threads, extensions - calling into non-thread-safe libraries may not work reliably when
- calling fork(). As Perl's threading support gradually becomes more
- widely adopted even on platforms with a native fork(), such extensions
- are expected to be fixed for thread-safety.
BUGS
-
Having pseudo-process IDs be negative integers breaks down for the integer
-1 because the wait() and waitpid() functions treat this number as
being special. The tacit assumption in the current implementation is that
the system never allocates a thread ID of 1 for user threads. A better
representation for pseudo-process IDs will be implemented in future.
In certain cases, the OS-level handles created by the pipe(), socket(),
and accept() operators are apparently not duplicated accurately in
pseudo-processes. This only happens in some situations, but where it
does happen, it may result in deadlocks between the read and write ends
of pipe handles, or inability to send or receive data across socket
handles.
This document may be incomplete in some respects.
AUTHOR
Support for concurrent interpreters and thefork() emulation was implemented
by ActiveState? , with funding from Microsoft Corporation.
This document is authored and maintained by Gurusamy Sarathy
<gsar@activestate.com>.
